Chris ([info]simon_stylites) wrote,
@ 2009-01-05 01:00:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
gregory peck is a funny man, who knew
I spent three days watching Roman Holiday, in little bits and pieces, while eating sandwiches or whatnot. Perhaps that is how I can watch Hollywood movies. It didn't seem to lose momentum or anything. The movie is not so great, although it does make Rome look like a fun place to visit, with lots of great backdrops. Mostly, though, Gregory Peck comes off as someone with excellent comedic timing -- far funnier than the actual "funny guy" in the movie, Eddie Albert, who hams it up awkwardly -- and certainly more interesting than Audrey Hepburn, whose blank face is upstaged by her haircut. (She won an Oscar for that? What? Whatever, Hollywood.)



(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)

audrey
[info]anthonyeaston
2009-01-06 10:04 am UTC (link)
no one has ever explained to me the glory of audrey hepburn, in any of her roles, except maybe the blind crime victim one.

miss you

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: audrey
[info]simon_stylites
2009-01-06 01:04 pm UTC (link)
Elsewhere I was reminded that the appeal of "Breathless" lies mostly in Jean Seberg's haircut. Perhaps this is a trend.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: audrey
[info]anthonyeaston
2009-01-06 01:09 pm UTC (link)
breathless has lots and lots of really great things about it, including but not limited to:

-everyone's clothes (the skinny suites, the international herald tribune t shirt, the striped dress)
-that scene where they are talking, seberg and michel, about bogie, in bed, which manages to be more about fucking then almost anything else in cinema, wihtout the fucking
-godard playing himself as the informer
- the jump cuts.

i mean i love breathless. (also, seberg's hair does deserve a fantastic place)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: audrey
(Anonymous)
2009-01-06 01:12 pm UTC (link)
(basically, breathless is one of those films where what things look like is more impt then anything else_

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: audrey
[info]simon_stylites
2009-01-06 01:14 pm UTC (link)
If the movie was just the scene in bed, it would be pretty good.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mwwhitesf
2009-01-07 10:13 pm UTC (link)
I like Peck in this movie - he has a warmth and looseness he often loses when badly directed. I cannot fathom why you don't see Hepburn's charm in this; the tension between her duties and her girlish desires, her captivity and the freedom of the city, she carries off well, and yes she had a captivating new hairdo and a waifish figure but there's surely no harm in that.

As to 'Au bout de souffle', Belmondo is a zillion times better in that than Seburg even if it does contain much of what would later constitute his shtick.

(Reply to this)

yes, little sandwiches! (cut in triangles, no crust.)
[info]thelican
2009-02-06 02:17 am UTC (link)
This is how I watched both Roman Holiday and An American in Paris, most recently! (There is something in the unawares glossiness of that style that requires such serving sizes, i think.)

[Pardon me. I noticed you via chronofile, and just had to say something.]

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: yes, little sandwiches! (cut in triangles, no crust.)
[info]simon_stylites
2009-02-06 02:26 am UTC (link)
No problem; Mr. File had recommended your LJ to me, and I've poked in every so often.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…